宁波港

601018.SH

Wind Industry: 工业 > 交通运输 > 交通基础设施 > 海港与服务

公司以“对标提升”为主线，攻坚克难、勇毅进取，完成货物吞吐量11.35亿吨，同比增长3.4%；完成集装箱吞吐量4764.2万标箱，同比增长10.4%；助推宁波舟山港货物吞吐量完成13.77亿吨，集装箱吞吐量完成3930.1万标箱，为宁波舟山港货物吞吐量连续16年保持全球港口第一，集装箱吞吐量稳居全球港口第三发挥了主力军、主战场作用。近年来，公司先后获得中国企业500强、中国上市公司最具投资价值100强、中国港口行业十大影响力品牌、中国十大最让人满意港口、全国“五一”劳动奖状、全国文明单位、国家多式联运示范工程等荣誉称号，并成功入围世界集装箱“五佳港口”(中国大陆唯一入围港口)。展望未来，公司上下将高举习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想伟大旗帜，全面贯彻党的二十大、二十届历次全会和中央、省市经济工作会议精神，以“三提三争”为重要抓手，以爬坡过坎、滚石上山的毅力韧劲，着力推动公司高质量发展不断开拓新局面、取得新成效。

ESG Score Industry Ranking:
4 / 67 (交通基础设施)

ESG Rating Distribution(交通基础设施)

2.99%

AAA

16.42%

32.84%

17.91%

BBB

14.93%

10.45%

1.49%

CCC

Trend of Rating

About Wind ESG Rating

Wind has developed a rigorous rating methodology based on the core connotations of ESG, aligning with international standards and frameworks, and incorporating the characteristics of Chinese companies, to assess the company's essential ESG performance, risk and its ability to operate sustainably.

Focusing on the ESG risks and opportunities of each industry, the companies are rated on a AAA-CCC scale relative to the performance of their industry peers. Wind ESG rating is updated annually or in response to major changes.

The Wind ESG Rating Issuer Communication Platform (esg.wind.com.cn) is now available. Rated companies can access their detailed rating information through this platform, and communicate with or provide feedback to the Wind ESG Rating team regarding specific rating components. For any additional questions, please feel free to send an email to GR.ESG@wind.com.cn.

ESG Score

ESG Score：8.59Updated on 2026-10-29

08.5910

Management & Practices Score：5.59Updated on 2026-10-25

05.597

Controversies Score：3.00Updated on 2026-10-29

03.003

ESG Score Comparison

Indicator	Company Score	Industry Average	Weight
Environmental	7.65	4.37	29.83%
Social	7.85	5.13	43.39%
Governance	8.61	6.26	26.78%

Wind ESG Rating Framework

Building on the foundation of domestic and international ESG policies and standards, our proprietary ESG rating framework considers the development of Chinese capital market and integrates the characteristics of the Chinese companies in various industries. The Wind ESG Rating framework is composed of management & practice and controversies assessment, including:

500+ management & practices indicators, covering E, S and G pillars, reflecting long-term ESG fundamental impacts
1,200+ risk labels, covering news, regulatory penalties and lawsuits, reflecting impact of short-term risks

Management & practice score is the weighted summation of E, S and G pillar scores. The weights reflect both the relative impact of each issue within each industry and the negative or positive contribution of each industry to the environment and society relative to other industries.

Controversies score and ESG score are updated daily, E, S and G pillar scores and management & practice score are updated with underlying data, corresponding data are released on various channels, including Wind Financial Terminal.

Explore More

Wind ESG Rating Methodology.pdf1,198KB Wind ESG Ratings FAQs.pdf755KB

More Details

Peer Comparison(67 companies in the industry) ?

Ranking	Code	Security Name	ESG Rating	ESG Score	Controversies Score	Management & Practices Score	Environmental	Social	Governance
1	001872.SZ	招商港口	AAA	9.20	3.00	6.20	8.65	9.25	8.44
2	001965.SZ	招商公路	AAA	9.15	3.00	6.15	8.04	9.09	8.85
3	0144.HK	招商局港口	AA	8.64	3.00	5.64	8.49	8.09	7.52
4	601018.SH	宁波港	AA	8.59	3.00	5.59	7.65	7.85	8.61
5	600350.SH	山东高速	AA	8.51	2.88	5.63	6.13	8.36	8.91
6	600548.SH	深高速	AA	8.37	3.00	5.37	8.63	6.82	8.38
7	600035.SH	楚天高速	AA	8.12	2.99	5.12	6.31	7.34	8.03
8	0152.HK	深圳国际	AA	8.09	3.00	5.09	7.42	7.12	7.42
9	000582.SZ	北部湾港	AA	8.04	3.00	5.04	8.04	7.06	6.48
9	0694.HK	北京首都机场股份	AA	8.04	3.00	5.04	6.70	7.24	7.45